There's money to be made in education, argues Bob Bowdon, however exclusively when you crop out the unprofitable bits, like fantastic teachers. In his documentary "The Cartel," New Jersey TV news reporter Bowdon shines a light on the depravity and greed that has resulted in the disappearing of so much taxpayer money in that state. The numbers declare the tale: $17,000 exhausted per pupil, and there's just a 39% reading proficiency rate, it's hard to argue that there's a crisis underway, but harder to agree on a solution.
The two sides of this struggle meet head-on in interviews throughout Bowdon's picture: there are the teachers union and school board members who have managed to allocate 90 cents of every taxpayer buck into everything but teachers' salaries -- though several school administrators receive upwards of $100,000. On the other side are the supporters of charter schools -- private schools which can operate beyond the power of what Bowdon calls The Cartel. In those disordered public schools, Bowdon points out, it's practically inconceivable to fire a teacher -- so even a dreadful one has a trade for life.
"'The Cartel' examines lots of uncommon aspects of public teaching, tenure, funding, patronage drops, subversion --meaning thieving -- vouchers and charter schools," says Bowdon. "The phrase education documentary could sound to some like boring squared, but in fact the picture itself betrays an fiery passion for the plight of particularly inner-city children."
"The Cartel" started fashioning the round of the festivals in summer 2009, and made its theatrical debut nearly a year later, in spring 2010. The movie has started a lot of discussion, which should no doubt persist with the more-recent release of "An Inconvenient Truth" director Davis Guggenheim's own education expose, "Waiting for Superman." Bowdon sees the films as complementary, and hopes that "Superman," with its human-interest ideology, draws more notice to his own, which focuses on public policy. "The two films attain parallel conclusions," Bowdon says.
It is definitely analytical, couching its arguments in an assessment of how the money is being spent, or misspent. He follows the money to describe conclusions around how dirty the Jersey school system is, but his picture features moments of soaring emotion and heartache. One girl, crying after discovering she wasn't selected in a lottery for a charter school, tells the story of What Went Wrong as well as Bowdon's arguments.
And while it may be straightforward to accept the presence of corruption in a state so associated with organized crime, the uncomfortable fact of the subject is that this is a greatly familiar situation. Any watcher will acknowledge the failings of their own state's education system and the fight for control. The one he seems to be most behind is the charter schools, which take the reins from the unions and give them back to the taxpayer. But he also knows it'll be an uphill battle to recover control from those who've worked so hard to make education very profitable for the very few. - 40730
The two sides of this struggle meet head-on in interviews throughout Bowdon's picture: there are the teachers union and school board members who have managed to allocate 90 cents of every taxpayer buck into everything but teachers' salaries -- though several school administrators receive upwards of $100,000. On the other side are the supporters of charter schools -- private schools which can operate beyond the power of what Bowdon calls The Cartel. In those disordered public schools, Bowdon points out, it's practically inconceivable to fire a teacher -- so even a dreadful one has a trade for life.
"'The Cartel' examines lots of uncommon aspects of public teaching, tenure, funding, patronage drops, subversion --meaning thieving -- vouchers and charter schools," says Bowdon. "The phrase education documentary could sound to some like boring squared, but in fact the picture itself betrays an fiery passion for the plight of particularly inner-city children."
"The Cartel" started fashioning the round of the festivals in summer 2009, and made its theatrical debut nearly a year later, in spring 2010. The movie has started a lot of discussion, which should no doubt persist with the more-recent release of "An Inconvenient Truth" director Davis Guggenheim's own education expose, "Waiting for Superman." Bowdon sees the films as complementary, and hopes that "Superman," with its human-interest ideology, draws more notice to his own, which focuses on public policy. "The two films attain parallel conclusions," Bowdon says.
It is definitely analytical, couching its arguments in an assessment of how the money is being spent, or misspent. He follows the money to describe conclusions around how dirty the Jersey school system is, but his picture features moments of soaring emotion and heartache. One girl, crying after discovering she wasn't selected in a lottery for a charter school, tells the story of What Went Wrong as well as Bowdon's arguments.
And while it may be straightforward to accept the presence of corruption in a state so associated with organized crime, the uncomfortable fact of the subject is that this is a greatly familiar situation. Any watcher will acknowledge the failings of their own state's education system and the fight for control. The one he seems to be most behind is the charter schools, which take the reins from the unions and give them back to the taxpayer. But he also knows it'll be an uphill battle to recover control from those who've worked so hard to make education very profitable for the very few. - 40730
No comments:
Post a Comment